Keyword summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obesity Medicine results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 748 hits . Analysis detected 3,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,349 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,948 of 37,536 keywords). This Obesity Medicine is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Obesity Medicine
Keyword details
Total words: 2,349
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.5% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 31.8% 31.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 31.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst