Keyword summary
28% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland City Council results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 382 hits . Analysis detected 2,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,758 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,725 of 37,536 keywords). This Oakland City Council is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Oakland City Council
Keyword details
Total words: 4,758
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst