Keyword summary
â 30% 1 analyzed article/video 454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Cannabis Regulatory Commission results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Unattributed Quote , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 133 hits . Analysis detected 757 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,362 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of â 74% (9,859 of 37,536 keywords). This Oakland Cannabis Regulatory Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Oakland Cannabis Regulatory Commission
Keyword details
Total words: 1,362
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst