Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Boxing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 4,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,725 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,285 of 36,715 keywords). This Oakland Boxing is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Oakland Boxing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
62%Oakland Boxing (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,725
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos