Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Transit results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 900 hits . Analysis detected 8,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,468 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,726 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Transit is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Nyc Transit
Keyword details
Total words: 8,468
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst