Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Transit results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 900 hits. Analysis detected 8,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,468 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,726 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Transit is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Nyc Transit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Nyc Transit (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,468
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate