Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Shipyard results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 306 hits. Analysis detected 1,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,558 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Shipyard is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Nyc Shipyard
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Nyc Shipyard (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos