Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Shipyard results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,558 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Shipyard is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Nyc Shipyard
Keyword details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst