Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Politics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 5,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,266 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,387 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Nyc Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 4,266
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst