Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nyc Health Department results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 2,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,649 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Health Department is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Nyc Health Department
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
48%Nyc Health Department (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,976
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos