Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nyc Democratic Congressional Primaries results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 1,032 hits. Analysis detected 4,607 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Nyc Democratic Congressional Primaries is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nyc Democratic Congressional Primaries
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 30.9%30.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos