Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nutrition Tips results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 3,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,229 of 37,536 keywords). This Nutrition Tips is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Nutrition Tips
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
71%Nutrition Tips (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,510
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos