Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Treaty results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 627 hits . Analysis detected 4,293 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,631 of 37,536 keywords). This Nuclear Treaty is worse (more manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group. Nuclear Treaty
Keyword details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.0% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst