Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Armament results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.9% saturation with 947 hits. Analysis detected 4,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,085 of 37,536 keywords). This Nuclear Armament is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Nuclear Armament
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Nuclear Armament (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,210
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 42.9%42.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 20.2%20.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.0%9.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 42.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos