Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Npr Wild Card results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.5% saturation with 623 hits. Analysis detected 3,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,143 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,151 of 37,536 keywords). This Npr Wild Card is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Npr Wild Card
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
97%Npr Wild Card (selected)13%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,143
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

97% percentile
025507510096.9% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 54.5%54.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 33.3%33.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 43.9%43.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 33.0%33.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Keyword 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Keyword 54.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 43.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 33.0%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 0.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos