Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nothing Ear (3a) results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 698 hits. Analysis detected 3,948 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,271 of 36,177 keywords). This Nothing Ear (3a) is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Nothing Ear (3a)
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
89%Nothing Ear (3a) (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 27.9%27.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 26.5%26.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos