Keyword summary
28% 2 analyzed articles/videos 760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Notario Fraud results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 5,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,288 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,559 of 37,303 keywords). This Notario Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Notario Fraud
Keyword details
Total words: 5,288
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst