Keyword summary
60% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Minneapolis results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 4,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,186 of 34,744 keywords). This North Minneapolis is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. North Minneapolis
Keyword details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst