Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Carolina Politics results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Bandwagon , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 354 hits . Analysis detected 1,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 970 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,515 of 37,536 keywords). This North Carolina Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. North Carolina Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 970
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.0% percentile 11.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles970 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.7% 22.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 36.5% 36.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 36.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 6.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 0.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst