Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norfolk Virginia results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,688 of 37,536 keywords). This Norfolk Virginia is worse (more manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Norfolk Virginia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
88%Norfolk Virginia (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.5% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 23.6%23.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 15.0%15.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.9%14.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Straw Man: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos