Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nolan results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 7,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,056 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,597 of 37,536 keywords). This Nolan is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Nolan
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Nolan (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,056
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate