Keyword summary
â 94% 1 analyzed article/video 1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noem V Vasquez Perdomo results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 962 hits . Analysis detected 8,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of â 82% (6,786 of 37,304 keywords). This Noem V Vasquez Perdomo is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Noem V Vasquez Perdomo
Keyword details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.9% 21.9% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst