Keyword summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nobel Peace Prize results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 502 hits . Analysis detected 1,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,691 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (20,802 of 35,955 keywords). This Nobel Peace Prize is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Nobel Peace Prize
Keyword details
Total words: 2,691
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst