Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Noah Brown results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Self-Serving Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 345 hits . Analysis detected 951 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Noah Brown is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Noah Brown
Keyword details
Total words: 3,600
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst