Keyword summary
69% 1 analyzed article/video 1,321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nio results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 593 hits . Analysis detected 3,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,963 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,306 of 37,536 keywords). This Nio is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Nio
Keyword details
Total words: 3,963
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst