Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nimbyism results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Ad Hominem , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 409 hits . Analysis detected 5,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,987 of 37,536 keywords). This Nimbyism is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Nimbyism
Keyword details
Total words: 5,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst