Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nightcaps results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 738 hits. Analysis detected 5,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,433 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,660 of 34,724 keywords). This Nightcaps is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Nightcaps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Nightcaps (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,433
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos