Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nielsen results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 815 hits. Analysis detected 6,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,863 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,034 of 37,536 keywords). This Nielsen is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.
Nielsen
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%Nielsen (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,863
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.6% percentile
9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 43.8%43.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 21.3%21.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 25.7%25.7%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.0%19.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 36.7%36.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 43.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 36.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos