Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Schroer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 687 hits. Analysis detected 4,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,505 of 37,533 keywords). This Nick Schroer is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Nick Schroer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Nick Schroer (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.3%19.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos