Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Schroer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 687 hits . Analysis detected 4,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,505 of 37,533 keywords). This Nick Schroer is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Nick Schroer
Keyword details
Total words: 3,544
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.7% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst