Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Niall Ferguson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,878 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Niall Ferguson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Niall Ferguson
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Niall Ferguson (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,878
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.4%14.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Is History Dead?69%
The Free Press71%By The Editors91%7/21/2026, 7:09:27 PM