Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nft results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 1,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,174 of 37,536 keywords). This Nft is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Nft
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
44%Nft (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos