Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Zealand Japan Relations results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of 98% (716 of 34,568 keywords). This New Zealand Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
New Zealand Japan Relations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
98%New Zealand Japan Relations (selected)16%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

98% percentile
025507510097.9% percentile
15.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles488 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 30.9%30.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 48.8%48.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 16.0%16.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.2%9.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 48.8%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos