Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Times Investigation results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 1,492 hits. Analysis detected 9,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,262 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (6,186 of 37,536 keywords). This New York Times Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
New York Times Investigation
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,262
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 35.0%35.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.1%15.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 35.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Red Herring: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos