Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York State Budget results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 957 hits . Analysis detected 8,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,248 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,478 of 37,536 keywords). This New York State Budget is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. New York State Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 9,248
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst