Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 766 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Mets results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 826 hits . Analysis detected 6,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,655 of 37,530 keywords). This New York Mets is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. New York Mets
Keyword details
Total words: 5,768
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst