Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New York Comptroller results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 5,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This New York Comptroller is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
New York Comptroller
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%New York Comptroller (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos