Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,381 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Primaries results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 2,340 hits. Analysis detected 12,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,524 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,634 of 37,536 keywords). This New York City Primaries is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group.
New York City Primaries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
83%New York City Primaries (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,524
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 42.4%42.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 42.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos