Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Budget results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Begging the Question , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 3,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,540 of 37,536 keywords). This New York City Budget is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. New York City Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst