Keyword summary
7%2 analyzed articles/videos5,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New World Screwworm results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 1,025 hits. Analysis detected 9,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,765 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,922 of 37,536 keywords). This New World Screwworm is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
New World Screwworm
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
2%New World Screwworm (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 20,765
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos