Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Tsa Screening results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Status Quo Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 198 hits . Analysis detected 1,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,145 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,800 of 37,536 keywords). This New Tsa Screening is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. New Tsa Screening
Keyword details
Total words: 2,145
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst