Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Single results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 2,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,439 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,578 of 37,536 keywords). This New Single is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
New Single
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
62%New Single (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,439
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos