Keyword summary
48% 2 analyzed articles/videos 756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Delhi results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 2,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,386 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (11,030 of 37,536 keywords). This New Delhi is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. New Delhi
Keyword details
Total words: 2,386
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.6% percentile 4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst