Keyword summary
27% 1 analyzed article/video 1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Deal Art results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 939 hits . Analysis detected 3,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,445 of 37,536 keywords). This New Deal Art is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. New Deal Art
Keyword details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst