Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Netanyahu Israel Iran Deal Trump results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 3,686 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Netanyahu Israel Iran Deal Trump is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Netanyahu Israel Iran Deal Trump
Keyword details
Total words: 2,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.0% 29.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst