Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neomow X Se results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 583 hits. Analysis detected 2,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,314 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,176 of 37,536 keywords). This Neomow X Se is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Neomow X Se
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%Neomow X Se (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,314
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510091.5% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 44.4%44.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 19.0%19.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 44.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos