Keyword summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neofascist Group results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 497 hits . Analysis detected 3,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,681 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,355 of 37,123 keywords). This Neofascist Group is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Neofascist Group
Keyword details
Total words: 3,681
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst