Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,726 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Diamond Tribute results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 1,192 hits . Analysis detected 5,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,178 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,927 of 37,536 keywords). This Neil Diamond Tribute is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Neil Diamond Tribute
Keyword details
Total words: 5,178
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst