Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ned Segal results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 336 hits. Analysis detected 1,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,330 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (26,141 of 37,536 keywords). This Ned Segal is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Ned Segal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠31%Ned Segal (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,330
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Straw Man: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos