Keyword summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos2,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natural Resources Defense Council results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 2,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,036 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (51,347 of 55,649 keywords). This Natural Resources Defense Council is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Natural Resources Defense Council
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 9,036
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751007.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos