Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Summit Rutte Stoltenberg Trump Flattery Pitch results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 3,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (16,656 of 37,536 keywords). This Nato Summit Rutte Stoltenberg Trump Flattery Pitch is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Nato Summit Rutte Stoltenberg Trump Flattery Pitch
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.5%22.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos