Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Spending results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,552 of 37,536 keywords). This Nato Spending is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Nato Spending
Keyword details
Total words: 2,176
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst