Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 322 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NATO Japan Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 418 hits . Analysis detected 2,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,161 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,239 of 35,668 keywords). This NATO Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. NATO Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 1,161
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.9% percentile 7.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.4% 25.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 36.0% 36.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 36.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst